
With the growing global scarcity of drinking water, the demand for practical and energy-efficient desalination methods is on the rise. Among potential solutions are osmotic desalination methods like capacitive deionization and its advanced form, flow-electrode capacitive deionization (FCDI). Flow electrodes are streaming electrodes composed of conductive particles suspended in a liquid. When electrically charged, these particles behave like capacitors and gain capacitive properties.
In flow-electrode deionization, flowable carbon electrodes are combined with ion-exchange membranes. The use of membranes enables continuous and efficient desalination. Membranes induce a selective transport of charged ions, allowing oppositely charged ions (counterions) to pass while repelling similarly charged ions (co-ions). This selective ion transport is essential for targeted salt removal from the feed stream.
Research advancements have improved membrane properties, associated ion selectivity, and the design of galvanic cells, leading to practical applications. For example, flow-electrode deionization was tested for industrial feasibility in a pilot plant in 2023. Performance optimization depends significantly on understanding how ion transport behaves with different membrane configurations. Ion-exchange membranes play a key role in controlling ion movement. Certain membrane arrangements, such as membrane “sandwiches” made of anion and cation exchange membranes, significantly accelerated desalination. While promising results were achieved with simple salt solutions like NaCl and KCl, mixtures of diverse ions, as found naturally in seawater, are more challenging.
Researchers from RWTH Aachen University recently investigated how different ion-exchange membrane arrangements affect selective ion removal from complex salt mixtures, such as those containing carbonate and sulfate ions, in flow-electrode deionization. Their findings were published in the journal Desalination. Two deionization modules with different membrane setups were analyzed. Membrane layers were tested with the cation membrane on the inside and the anion membrane on the outside, and vice versa. Both configurations delivered similar desalination performance, but the time to reach a stable state varied depending on the arrangement and the flow electrode’s buffering capacity.
The tested anion exchange membranes showed a higher affinity for sulfate ions than for carbonate ions, which delayed stabilization in some cases. Strategies like reducing electrode volume and steering specific ions along the electrode path helped reach the steady state more quickly. These findings underscore the importance of membrane selectivity, electrode properties, and system design in enhancing the performance of flow-electrode deionization, especially for mixed-ion water sources.
The effectiveness of the process depends not just on reaching a steady desalination state but also on managing ion selectivity and system adaptation. With saltwater containing multiple cations and anions, membrane arrangement alone is not enough to achieve the desired results. To tackle these challenges, strategies like membrane coatings or modifying electrode properties must be considered.
The researchers also addressed evaluation methods in their study. Interestingly, measuring conductivity alone is not sufficient to assess desalination performance. While it indicates total salt concentration, it does not reflect changes in salt composition. Therefore, more precise evaluation methods are needed to meet specific requirements.
These advances are crucial for optimizing flow-electrode deionization performance and meeting the growing demand for efficient, adaptable water treatment technologies. At Frontis Energy, we are excited to see how this groundbreaking technology will scale in the future.
Image: Pixabay







